Obviously, this is just my opinion, it goes beyond the realm of aesthetics or preference.

This sentence has an omission. Please correct to:

Obviously, this is just my opinion, yet it goes beyond the realm of aesthetics or preference.

I admit that, as time goes by, the more films of Tarantino I see the more I hate his work

I second that. I have no desire or intention of watching Death Proof. I feel like the critical and economic success of his early work was luck, or rather the realisation of a few interesting, novel and mature ideas and the accompanying aesthetic to an audience that was — at the time — in great need of such refreshingly satirical subtly surreal cinematic experiences after the excesses of the previous decade (ironically the same conceptual grounds of his later films). Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction were both in that category.

Sadly, he has been milking the same basic ideas — in one way or another — over and over again, for more than a decade, while dressing them up in thinly veiled, rushed and pointless scenarios. Yet this is not the early 1990s, times have changed and Tarantino’s work since then resembles the work of a clown that had a hit trick that wore out and is constantly coming up with ’seemingly’ new — yet increasingly frivolous — tricks in order to amuse his audience.

Still, the industry and those supporting it have made it possible (or, indeed, easy) for him to establish himself as a cult director when he’s — in my opinion — just a vastly overrated maverick who still largely depends on the originality and success of his early work as vehicles for his newer films, while enjoying the support a largely braindead U.S. audience.

Obviously, this is just my opinion, it goes beyond the realm of aesthetics or preference.

P.S.: Sugar, why aren’t you using UTF-8?

@stelabouras: You should check out this one, then