<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everything you know about CSS is wrong &#8211; orly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sugarenia.com/archives/interesting/everything-you-know-about-css-is-wrong-orly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sugarenia.com/archives/interesting/everything-you-know-about-css-is-wrong-orly</link>
	<description>web standards, usability &#38; other girly stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 11:49:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sugar</title>
		<link>http://blog.sugarenia.com/archives/interesting/everything-you-know-about-css-is-wrong-orly/comment-page-1#comment-101063</link>
		<dc:creator>Sugar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sugarenia.com/?p=648#comment-101063</guid>
		<description>@John

I cannot accept holy-grail methods.

What&#039;s fun (and terrifying) about CSS is that there is no absolutely correct way to do things.

It&#039;s all very fluid. You evolve as a designer and your code evolves too.

I&#039;m sorry, but all this table properties stuff sounds scary to me. I wouldn&#039;t like to go back to sites all-designed-the-same-way.

I guess I&#039;ll never be the same after reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0321410971?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=sugareniacom-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0321410971&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Transcending CSS&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John</p>
<p>I cannot accept holy-grail methods.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s fun (and terrifying) about CSS is that there is no absolutely correct way to do things.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all very fluid. You evolve as a designer and your code evolves too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but all this table properties stuff sounds scary to me. I wouldn&#8217;t like to go back to sites all-designed-the-same-way.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ll never be the same after reading <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0321410971?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=sugareniacom-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=0321410971" rel="nofollow">Transcending CSS</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Tsevdos</title>
		<link>http://blog.sugarenia.com/archives/interesting/everything-you-know-about-css-is-wrong-orly/comment-page-1#comment-100569</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tsevdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sugarenia.com/?p=648#comment-100569</guid>
		<description>I saw the book as well sugar, and of course i read Sitepoint&#039;s article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sitepoint.com/article/the-problem-with-css-is/&quot; title=&quot;The Problem with CSS is ...&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Problem with CSS is ...&lt;/a&gt;, and I have to say I&#039;m a bit confused as well... And it&#039;s not only Sitepoint, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digital-web.com/articles/everything_you_know_about_CSS_Is_wrong/&quot; title=&quot;Everything You Know About CSS Is Wrong&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Digital Web Magazine&lt;/a&gt; posted a similar article explaining this new technique... 

It&#039;s vital to write here, that CSS table-related display properties work only on IE8 and the other major browsers (FF, Opera, Safari, etc.) but &lt;strong&gt;not IE7&lt;/strong&gt; which makes the technique a bit useless at the moment... Maybe in few years (when IE9/10 is ready)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the book as well sugar, and of course i read Sitepoint&#8217;s article <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/article/the-problem-with-css-is/" title="The Problem with CSS is ..." rel="nofollow">The Problem with CSS is &#8230;</a>, and I have to say I&#8217;m a bit confused as well&#8230; And it&#8217;s not only Sitepoint, <a href="http://www.digital-web.com/articles/everything_you_know_about_CSS_Is_wrong/" title="Everything You Know About CSS Is Wrong" rel="nofollow">Digital Web Magazine</a> posted a similar article explaining this new technique&#8230; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s vital to write here, that CSS table-related display properties work only on IE8 and the other major browsers (FF, Opera, Safari, etc.) but <strong>not IE7</strong> which makes the technique a bit useless at the moment&#8230; Maybe in few years (when IE9/10 is ready)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madvil</title>
		<link>http://blog.sugarenia.com/archives/interesting/everything-you-know-about-css-is-wrong-orly/comment-page-1#comment-100499</link>
		<dc:creator>Madvil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sugarenia.com/?p=648#comment-100499</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the title is definitely over-bloating. Evolution in web design lies at building upon the existing fundamentals. Surely things will never stay frozen and the same : Just take a look at when the last HTML version was out and think for a while if that was good or not.

They only want us to start hunting a carrot down the road, and for some reason everyone has a different carrot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the title is definitely over-bloating. Evolution in web design lies at building upon the existing fundamentals. Surely things will never stay frozen and the same : Just take a look at when the last HTML version was out and think for a while if that was good or not.</p>
<p>They only want us to start hunting a carrot down the road, and for some reason everyone has a different carrot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

